lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YOb0uklBx0NOLKG3@mit.edu> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:51:06 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> To: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com> Cc: fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] ext4/003: Fix this test on 64K platform for dax config On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 11:54:45AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > Yes, thanks for catching it. I think if make below change, i.e. scale cluster > size, we should be good. Since this will make blocks_per_group = 4096 and > clusters_per_group = 256. This is the condition, which I guess the original > kernel patch fixed it for. So, we need not increase the filesystem size. > > $MKFS_EXT4_PROG -F -b $BLOCK_SIZE -O bigalloc -C $((BLOCK_SIZE * 16)) -g 256 $SCRATCH_DEV 512m \ > Agreed, it looks like that should work. Cheers, - Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists