linux-ext4 - [PATCH 07/14] xfs: Refactor xfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210712165609.13215-7-jack@suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jul 2021 18:55:58 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Reichl <preichl@...hat.com>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
        Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 07/14] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked()

From: Pavel Reichl <preichl@...hat.com>

Introduce a new __xfs_rwsem_islocked predicate to encapsulate checking
the state of a rw_semaphore, then refactor xfs_isilocked to use it.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@...hat.com>
Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Suggested-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Suggested-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index a835ceb79ba5..359e2cd44ad7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -343,9 +343,29 @@ xfs_ilock_demote(
 }
 
 #if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
-int
+static inline bool
+__xfs_rwsem_islocked(
+	struct rw_semaphore	*rwsem,
+	bool			shared)
+{
+	if (!debug_locks)
+		return rwsem_is_locked(rwsem);
+
+	if (!shared)
+		return lockdep_is_held_type(rwsem, 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * We are checking that the lock is held at least in shared
+	 * mode but don't care that it might be held exclusively
+	 * (i.e. shared | excl). Hence we check if the lock is held
+	 * in any mode rather than an explicit shared mode.
+	 */
+	return lockdep_is_held_type(rwsem, -1);
+}
+
+bool
 xfs_isilocked(
-	xfs_inode_t		*ip,
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
 	uint			lock_flags)
 {
 	if (lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)) {
@@ -360,15 +380,13 @@ xfs_isilocked(
 		return rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_mmaplock.mr_lock);
 	}
 
-	if (lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL|XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)) {
-		if (!(lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED))
-			return !debug_locks ||
-				lockdep_is_held_type(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem, 0);
-		return rwsem_is_locked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
+	if (lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)) {
+		return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem,
+				(lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED));
 	}
 
 	ASSERT(0);
-	return 0;
+	return false;
 }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
index 4b6703dbffb8..4b5202ae8ebb 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ void		xfs_ilock(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
 int		xfs_ilock_nowait(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
 void		xfs_iunlock(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
 void		xfs_ilock_demote(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
-int		xfs_isilocked(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
+bool		xfs_isilocked(struct xfs_inode *, uint);
 uint		xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(struct xfs_inode *);
 uint		xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared(struct xfs_inode *);
 
-- 
2.26.2