[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <41F4A61F-DB56-4814-8E52-99A742F44FAF@dilger.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 12:20:03 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] ext2fs: Drop HAS_SNAPSHOT feature
NAK.
We are working on a snapshot implementation for ext4, it is
just taking a lot longer that I thought it would to complete.
There isn't any shortage of these feature bits, so no reason to re-use them.
Cheers, Andreas
> On Jul 12, 2021, at 09:43, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> It has never been implemented and is dead for quite some time and
> unused AFAICT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> ---
> lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h b/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h
> index e92a045205a9..6f1d5db4b482 100644
> --- a/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h
> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h
> @@ -825,7 +825,6 @@ struct ext2_super_block {
> #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM 0x0010
> #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DIR_NLINK 0x0020
> #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE 0x0040
> -#define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_HAS_SNAPSHOT 0x0080
> #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_QUOTA 0x0100
> #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_BIGALLOC 0x0200
> /*
> @@ -926,7 +925,6 @@ EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_FUNCS(huge_file, 4, HUGE_FILE)
> EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_FUNCS(gdt_csum, 4, GDT_CSUM)
> EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_FUNCS(dir_nlink, 4, DIR_NLINK)
> EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_FUNCS(extra_isize, 4, EXTRA_ISIZE)
> -EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_FUNCS(has_snapshot, 4, HAS_SNAPSHOT)
> EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_FUNCS(quota, 4, QUOTA)
> EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_FUNCS(bigalloc, 4, BIGALLOC)
> EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_FUNCS(metadata_csum, 4, METADATA_CSUM)
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists