[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210714055940.1553705-1-guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:59:40 +0800
From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>
To: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: remove conflict comment from __ext4_forget
From: Guoqing Jiang <jiangguoqing@...inos.cn>
We do a bforget and return for no journal case, so let's remove this
conflict comment.
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <jiangguoqing@...inos.cn>
---
Change from RFC: add Jan's Reviewed-by.
fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
index be799040a415..6e224b19eae7 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
@@ -244,9 +244,6 @@ int __ext4_journal_get_write_access(const char *where, unsigned int line,
* "bh" may be NULL: a metadata block may have been freed from memory
* but there may still be a record of it in the journal, and that record
* still needs to be revoked.
- *
- * If the handle isn't valid we're not journaling, but we still need to
- * call into ext4_journal_revoke() to put the buffer head.
*/
int __ext4_forget(const char *where, unsigned int line, handle_t *handle,
int is_metadata, struct inode *inode,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists