[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210715120818.GF9457@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:08:18 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz, yukuai3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ext4: factor out write end code of inline file
On Thu 15-07-21 09:54:51, Zhang Yi wrote:
> Now that the inline_data file write end procedure are falled into the
> common write end functions, it is not clear. Factor them out and do
> some cleanup. This patch also drop ext4_da_write_inline_data_end()
> and switch to use ext4_write_inline_data_end() instead because we also
> need to do the same error processing if we failed to write data into
> inline entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Just two small comments below.
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inline.c b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> index 28b666f25ac2..3d227b32b21c 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inline.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inline.c
...
> +out:
> + /*
> + * If we have allocated more blocks and copied less. We will have
> + * blocks allocated outside inode->i_size, so truncate them.
> + */
> + if (pos + len > inode->i_size && ext4_can_truncate(inode))
> + ext4_orphan_add(handle, inode);
I don't think we need this error handling here. For inline data we never
allocate any blocks so shorter writes don't need any cleanup.
> - return copied;
> + ret2 = ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = ret2;
> + if (pos + len > inode->i_size) {
> + ext4_truncate_failed_write(inode);
> + /*
> + * If truncate failed early the inode might still be
> + * on the orphan list; we need to make sure the inode
> + * is removed from the orphan list in that case.
> + */
> + if (inode->i_nlink)
> + ext4_orphan_del(NULL, inode);
> + }
And this can go away as well...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists