lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 14:54:06 -0500 From: "Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)" <alex.sierra@....com> To: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@....com>, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, rcampbell@...dia.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, hch@....de, jgg@...dia.com, jglisse@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Support DEVICE_GENERIC memory in migrate_vma_* On 7/16/2021 5:14 PM, Felix Kuehling wrote: > Am 2021-07-16 um 11:07 a.m. schrieb Theodore Y. Ts'o: >> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Felix Kuehling wrote: >>> I can think of two ways to test the changes for MEMORY_DEVICE_GENERIC in >>> this patch series in a way that is reproducible without special hardware and >>> firmware: >>> >>> For the reference counting changes we could use the dax driver with hmem and >>> use efi_fake_mem on the kernel command line to create some DEVICE_GENERIC >>> pages. I'm open to suggestions for good user mode tests to exercise dax >>> functionality on this type of memory. >> Sorry for the thread necromancy, but now that the merge window is >> past.... > No worries. Alejandro should have a new version of this series in a few > days, with updates to hmm_test and some fixes. V4 patch series have been sent for review. https://marc.info/?l=dri-devel&m=162654971618911&w=2 Regards, Alex Sierra > > >> Today I test ext4's dax support, without having any $$$ DAX hardware, >> by using the kernel command line "memmap=4G!9G:memmap=9G!14G" which >> reserves memory so that creates two pmem device and then I run >> xfstests with DAX enabled using qemu or using a Google Compute Engine >> VM, using TEST_DEV=/dev/pmem0 and SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/pmem1. >> >> If you can give me a recipe for what kernel configs I should enable, >> and what magic kernel command line arguments to use, then I'd be able >> to test your patch set with ext4. > That would be great! > > Regarding kernel config options, it should be the same as what you're > using for DAX testing today. We're not changing or adding any Kconfig > options. But let me take a stab: > > ZONE_DEVICE > HMM_MIRROR > MMU_NOTIFIER > DEVICE_PRIVATE (maybe not needed for your test) > FS_DAX > > I'm not sure what you're looking for in terms of kernel command line, > other than the memmap options you already found. There are some more > options to run hmm_test with fake SPM (DEVICE_GENERIC) memory, but we're > already running that ourselves. That will also be in the next revision > of this patch series. In order to run hmm test with generic device type enabled, set the following: kernel config: EFI_FAKE_MEMMAP RUNTIME_TESTING_MENU TEST_HMM=m Kernel parameters to fake SP memory. The addresses set here are based on my system's usable memory enumerated by BIOS-e820 at boot. The test requires two SP devices of at least 256MB. efi_fake_mem=1G@...00000000:0x40000,1G@...40000000:0x40000 To run the hmm_test in generic device type pass the SP addresses to the sh script. sudo ./test_hmm.sh smoke 0x100000000 0x140000000 > > If you can run your xfstests with DAX on top of this patch series, that > would be very helpful. That's to make sure the ZONE_DEVICE page refcount > changes don't break DAX. > > Regards, > Felix > > >> Cheers, >> >> - Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists