lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 2 Aug 2021 00:00:14 +0800
From:   Eryu Guan <guan@...u.me>
To:     Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 5/9] generic/031: Fix the test case for 64k blocksize
 config

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:57:58AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> This test fails with blocksize 64k since the test assumes 4k blocksize
> in fcollapse param. This patch fixes that and also tests for 64k
> blocksize.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tests/generic/031     | 14 +++++++++-----
>  tests/generic/031.out | 16 ++++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/generic/031 b/tests/generic/031
> index 313ce9ff..11961c54 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/031
> +++ b/tests/generic/031
> @@ -26,11 +26,16 @@ testfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile
>  _scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1
>  _scratch_mount
>  
> +# fcollapse need offset and len to be multiple of blocksize for filesystems
> +# So let's make the offsets and len required for fcollapse multiples of 64K
> +# so that it works for all configurations (including on dax on 64K page size
> +# systems)
> +fact=$((65536/4096))
>  $XFS_IO_PROG -f \
> -	-c "pwrite 185332 55756" \
> -	-c "fcollapse 28672 40960" \
> -	-c "pwrite 133228 63394" \
> -	-c "fcollapse 0 4096" \
> +	-c "pwrite $((185332*fact + 12)) $((55756*fact + 12))" \

Where does this 12 come from? And I'm wondering if this still reproduces
the original bug.

And looks like that the original test setups came from a specific
fsstress or fsx run, and aimed to the specific bug, perhaps we could
require the test with <= 4k block size, and _notrun in 64k case.

Thanks,
Eryu

> +	-c "fcollapse $((28672 * fact)) $((40960 * fact))" \
> +	-c "pwrite $((133228 * fact + 12)) $((63394 * fact + 12))" \
> +	-c "fcollapse 0 $((4096 * fact))" \
>  $testfile | _filter_xfs_io
>  
>  echo "==== Pre-Remount ==="
> @@ -41,4 +46,3 @@ hexdump -C $testfile
>  
>  status=0
>  exit
> -
> diff --git a/tests/generic/031.out b/tests/generic/031.out
> index 194bfa45..7dfcfe41 100644
> --- a/tests/generic/031.out
> +++ b/tests/generic/031.out
> @@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
>  QA output created by 031
> -wrote 55756/55756 bytes at offset 185332
> +wrote 892108/892108 bytes at offset 2965324
>  XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> -wrote 63394/63394 bytes at offset 133228
> +wrote 1014316/1014316 bytes at offset 2131660
>  XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
>  ==== Pre-Remount ===
>  00000000  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
>  *
> -0001f860  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 cd cd cd cd  |................|
> -0001f870  cd cd cd cd cd cd cd cd  cd cd cd cd cd cd cd cd  |................|
> +001f86c0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 cd cd cd cd  |................|
> +001f86d0  cd cd cd cd cd cd cd cd  cd cd cd cd cd cd cd cd  |................|
>  *
> -0002fdc0
> +002fdc18
>  ==== Post-Remount ==
>  00000000  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
>  *
> -0001f860  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 cd cd cd cd  |................|
> -0001f870  cd cd cd cd cd cd cd cd  cd cd cd cd cd cd cd cd  |................|
> +001f86c0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 cd cd cd cd  |................|
> +001f86d0  cd cd cd cd cd cd cd cd  cd cd cd cd cd cd cd cd  |................|
>  *
> -0002fdc0
> +002fdc18
> -- 
> 2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists