[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQl/lYKtH747bMJd@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 13:40:37 -0400
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] libext2fs: Support for orphan file feature
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:57:36PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 05:43:10PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > @@ -825,6 +826,7 @@ struct ext2_super_block {
> > #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM 0x0010
> > #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DIR_NLINK 0x0020
> > #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE 0x0040
> > +#define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_ORPHAN_PRESENT 0x0080
> > #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_QUOTA 0x0100
> > #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_BIGALLOC 0x0200
>
> (This isn't a full review of the patch, but just a quick feedback of
> what I've noticed so far.)
>
> Since Andreas has requested that we not get rid of the
> RO_COMPAT_SNAPSHOT, I'm using 0x0400 for
> EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_ORPHAN_PRESENT in my testing.
Correction, this should have been 0x10000.
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists