[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxjMfJM4FM4tWJWgjbK4a2K1hNJdEBRvwQTh9+5su2N0Tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 11:56:31 +0300
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Cc: LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Validate incoming FID in FAN_FS_ERROR
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:47 AM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
<krisman@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Verify the FID provided in the event. If the testcase has a null inode,
> this is assumed to be a superblock error (i.e. null FH).
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
> ---
> .../kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
> index fd5cfb8744f1..d8d788ae685f 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,14 @@
>
> #define FAN_EVENT_INFO_TYPE_ERROR 4
>
> +#ifndef FILEID_INVALID
> +#define FILEID_INVALID 0xff
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef FILEID_INO32_GEN
> +#define FILEID_INO32_GEN 1
> +#endif
> +
> struct fanotify_event_info_error {
> struct fanotify_event_info_header hdr;
> __s32 error;
> @@ -57,6 +65,9 @@ static const struct test_case {
> char *name;
> int error;
> unsigned int error_count;
> +
> + /* inode can be null for superblock errors */
> + unsigned int *inode;
Any reason not to use fanotify_fid_t * like fanotify16.c?
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists