[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fsvphksu.fsf@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:54:09 -0400
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc: LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Validate incoming FID in
FAN_FS_ERROR
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:47 AM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
> <krisman@...labora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Verify the FID provided in the event. If the testcase has a null inode,
>> this is assumed to be a superblock error (i.e. null FH).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> .../kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
>> index fd5cfb8744f1..d8d788ae685f 100644
>> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
>> @@ -40,6 +40,14 @@
>>
>> #define FAN_EVENT_INFO_TYPE_ERROR 4
>>
>> +#ifndef FILEID_INVALID
>> +#define FILEID_INVALID 0xff
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#ifndef FILEID_INO32_GEN
>> +#define FILEID_INO32_GEN 1
>> +#endif
>> +
>> struct fanotify_event_info_error {
>> struct fanotify_event_info_header hdr;
>> __s32 error;
>> @@ -57,6 +65,9 @@ static const struct test_case {
>> char *name;
>> int error;
>> unsigned int error_count;
>> +
>> + /* inode can be null for superblock errors */
>> + unsigned int *inode;
>
> Any reason not to use fanotify_fid_t * like fanotify16.c?
No reason other than I didn't notice they existed. Sorry. I will get
this fixed.
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists