[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210805102929.GH14483@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 12:29:29 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Cc: jack@...e.com, amir73il@...il.com, djwong@...nel.org,
tytso@....edu, david@...morbit.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
khazhy@...gle.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 15/23] fanotify: Require fid_mode for any non-fd event
On Wed 04-08-21 12:06:04, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Like inode events, FAN_FS_ERROR will require fid mode. Therefore,
> convert the verification during fanotify_mark(2) to require fid for any
> non-fd event. This means fid_mode will not only be required for inode
> events, but for any event that doesn't provide a descriptor.
>
> Suggested-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Looks good. One style nit below, otherwise feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> /*
> - * Events with data type inode do not carry enough information to report
> - * event->fd, so we do not allow setting a mask for inode events unless
> - * group supports reporting fid.
> - * inode events are not supported on a mount mark, because they do not
> - * carry enough information (i.e. path) to be filtered by mount point.
> - */
> + * Events that do not carry enough information to report
> + * event->fd require a group that supports reporting fid. Those
> + * events are not supported on a mount mark, because they do not
> + * carry enough information (i.e. path) to be filtered by mount
> + * point.
> + */
^ I think these should be one column more to the right to align
with the opening /*.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists