[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ecf3253-5c77-e982-981a-b340ff705838@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 14:54:30 -0400
From: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@....com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
rcampbell@...dia.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, jgg@...dia.com, jglisse@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/13] drm/amdkfd: add SPM support for SVM
Am 2021-08-15 um 5:10 a.m. schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>> @@ -880,17 +881,22 @@ int svm_migrate_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> * should remove reserved size
>> */
>> size = ALIGN(adev->gmc.real_vram_size, 2ULL << 20);
>> - res = devm_request_free_mem_region(adev->dev, &iomem_resource, size);
>> + if (xgmi_connected_to_cpu)
>> + res = lookup_resource(&iomem_resource, adev->gmc.aper_base);
>> + else
>> + res = devm_request_free_mem_region(adev->dev, &iomem_resource, size);
>> +
> Can you explain what the point of the lookup_resource is here? res->start
> is obviously identical to the start value you pass in. So this is used
> as a way to query the length, but I'm pretty sure the driver must
> already know that as it inserted the resource itself, right?
I think you're right. We only need the start and end address from
lookup_resource and we already know that anyway. It means we can drop
patch 3 from the series.
Just to be sure, we'll confirm that the end address determined by our
driver matches the one from lookup_resource (coming from the system
address map in the system BIOS). If there were a mismatch, it would
probably be a bug (in the driver or the BIOS) that we'd need to fix anyway.
>
> On a slightly higher level comment svm_migrate_init is a bit of a mess
> with all the if/else already, and with the above addressed will become
> a bit more. I think splitting it into a device private and device
> generic case would probably help people finding it to understand the code
> much better later on. Even more so with a useful comment.
I don't really see the "mess" you're talking about. Including the above,
there are only 3 conditional statements in that function that are not
error-handling related:
/* Page migration works on Vega10 or newer */
if (kfddev->device_info->asic_family < CHIP_VEGA10)
return -EINVAL;
...
if (xgmi_connected_to_cpu)
res = lookup_resource(&iomem_resource, adev->gmc.aper_base);
else
res = devm_request_free_mem_region(adev->dev, &iomem_resource, size);
...
pgmap->type = xgmi_connected_to_cpu ?
MEMORY_DEVICE_GENERIC : MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE;
Regards,
Felix
Powered by blists - more mailing lists