[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210825074029.GC29433@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:40:29 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Felix.Kuehling@....com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, rcampbell@...dia.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
hch@....de, jgg@...dia.com, jglisse@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/14] mm: add iomem vma selection for memory
migration
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:48:17PM -0500, Alex Sierra wrote:
> In this case, this is used to migrate pages from device memory, back to
> system memory. This particular device memory type should be accessible
> by the CPU, through IOMEM access. Typically, zone device public type
> memory falls into this category.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>
> ---
> include/linux/migrate.h | 1 +
> mm/migrate.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
> index 4bb4e519e3f5..6b16f417384f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/migrate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
> @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ static inline unsigned long migrate_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
> enum migrate_vma_direction {
> MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_SYSTEM = 1 << 0,
> MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_DEVICE_PRIVATE = 1 << 1,
> + MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_IOMEM = 1 << 2,
> };
>
> struct migrate_vma {
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index e3a10e2a1bb3..d4ae2da99607 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -2406,7 +2406,8 @@ static int migrate_vma_collect_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
> if (is_write_device_private_entry(entry))
> mpfn |= MIGRATE_PFN_WRITE;
> } else {
> - if (!(migrate->flags & MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_SYSTEM))
> + if (!(migrate->flags & MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_SYSTEM) &&
> + !(migrate->flags & MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_IOMEM))
This makes the MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_SYSTEM and MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_IOMEM
behave entirely identifical, that is redundant. I think we need to
distinguish between the dfferent cases here. I think the right check
would be pfn_valid(), which should be true for system memory, and
false for iomem.
Also shouldn't this be called DEVICE_PUBLIC instead of IOMEM?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists