lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 30 Aug 2021 10:28:00 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@....com>
Cc:     "Sierra Guiza, Alejandro (Alex)" <alex.sierra@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, rcampbell@...dia.com,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        jgg@...dia.com, jglisse@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/14] mm: add iomem vma selection for memory
 migration

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 06:27:31PM -0400, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> I think we're missing something here. As far as I can tell, all the work
> we did first with DEVICE_GENERIC and now DEVICE_PUBLIC always used
> normal pages. Are we missing something in our driver code that would
> make these PTEs special? I don't understand how that can be, because
> driver code is not really involved in updating the CPU mappings. Maybe
> it's something we need to do in the migration helpers.

It looks like I'm totally misunderstanding what you are adding here
then.  Why do we need any special treatment at all for memory that
has normal struct pages and is part of the direct kernel map?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists