linux-ext4 - [PATCH 1/6] MM: improve documentation for __GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <163157838436.13293.8832201267053160346.stgit@noble.brown>
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:13:04 +1000
From:   NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.com>
Cc:     linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] MM: improve documentation for __GFP_NOFAIL

__GFP_NOFAIL is documented both in gfp.h and memory-allocation.rst.
The details are not entirely consistent.

This patch ensures both places state that:
 - there is a cost potentially imposed on other subsystems
 - it should only be used when there is no real alternative
 - it is preferable to an endless loop
 - it is strongly discourages for costly-order allocations.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
---
 Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst |    9 ++++++++-
 include/linux/gfp.h                          |    4 ++++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst b/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst
index 5954ddf6ee13..9458ce72d31c 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst
@@ -126,7 +126,14 @@ or another request.
 
   * ``GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL`` - overrides the default allocator behavior
     and all allocation requests will loop endlessly until they succeed.
-    This might be really dangerous especially for larger orders.
+    The allocator may provide access to memory that would otherwise be
+    reserved in order to satisfy this allocation which might adversely
+    affect other subsystems.  So it should only be used when there is no
+    reasonable failure policy and when the memory is likely to be freed
+    again in the near future.  Its use is strong discourage (via a
+    WARN_ON) for allocations larger than ``PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER``.
+    While this flag is best avoided, it is still preferable to endless
+    loops around the allocator.
 
 Selecting memory allocator
 ==========================
diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
index 55b2ec1f965a..101479373738 100644
--- a/include/linux/gfp.h
+++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
@@ -209,6 +209,10 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
  * used only when there is no reasonable failure policy) but it is
  * definitely preferable to use the flag rather than opencode endless
  * loop around allocator.
+ * Use of this flag may provide access to memory which would otherwise be
+ * reserved.  As such it must be understood that there can be a cost imposed
+ * on other subsystems as well as the obvious cost of placing the calling
+ * thread in an uninterruptible indefinite wait.
  * Using this flag for costly allocations is _highly_ discouraged.
  */
 #define __GFP_IO	((__force gfp_t)___GFP_IO)