linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: docs: switch away from list-table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wnmozy9i.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:48:41 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: docs: switch away from list-table

"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> writes:

> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 05:18:06PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> writes:
>> 
>> > On Thu 02-09-21 16:08:53, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> >> Commit 3a6541e97c03 (Add documentation about the orphan file feature) added
>> >> a new document on orphan files, which is great.  But the use of
>> >> "list-table" results in documents that are absolutely unreadable in their
>> >> plain-text form.  Switch this file to the regular RST table format instead;
>> >> the rendered (HTML) output is identical.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
>> >
>> > Thanks! Definitely looks more readable :). You can add:
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>> 
>> Thanks for having a look!  I'll ahead and apply these, then.
>
> Hey Jon,
>
> I don't see these patches in linux-next.  I'm guessing because you
> were busy with some silly thing like LPC.  :-)
>
> Do you want to take them, or I can take them through the ext4 tree.

Ah...I learned something today.  If you try to apply your own patches
with "git am -s" (via b4 to lazily grab Jan's Reviewed-by tags), it
fails, complaining about duplicate signoff lines.  I'd failed to notice
that before.  I've *really* applied them this time (and tweaked my
scripts :).

Thanks,

jon