lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YV8iTPcMBUQN80Ob@mit.edu>
Date:   Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:37:32 -0400
From:   "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz,
        yukuai3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ext4: check for inconsistent extents between
 index and leaf block

On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 08:08:49PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> Now that we can check out overlapping extents in leaf block and
> out-of-order index extents in index block. But the .ee_block in the
> first extent of one leaf block should equal to the .ei_block in it's
> parent index extent entry.

I don't believe this is always guaranteed.

The punch hole operation can remove some or part of the first entry in
the leaf block, and it won't update the parent index.  So it's OK for
the first entry of the leaf block to be greater than entry in the
parent block.  However, if the first entry of the leaf block is less
than the entry in the parent block, that's definitely going to be a
problem.

						- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ