lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:37:32 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz, yukuai3@...wei.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ext4: check for inconsistent extents between index and leaf block On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 08:08:49PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote: > Now that we can check out overlapping extents in leaf block and > out-of-order index extents in index block. But the .ee_block in the > first extent of one leaf block should equal to the .ei_block in it's > parent index extent entry. I don't believe this is always guaranteed. The punch hole operation can remove some or part of the first entry in the leaf block, and it won't update the parent index. So it's OK for the first entry of the leaf block to be greater than entry in the parent block. However, if the first entry of the leaf block is less than the entry in the parent block, that's definitely going to be a problem. - Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists