linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 07/29] target/iblock: use bdev_nr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:31:11 +0200
From:   Bodo Stroesser <bostroesser@...il.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
        Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
        Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>,
        Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>,
        Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Phillip Lougher <phillip@...ashfs.org.uk>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        dm-devel@...hat.com, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
        linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net, ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev,
        reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/29] target/iblock: use bdev_nr_sectors instead of open
 coding it

On 13.10.21 07:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Use the proper helper to read the block device size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
>   drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> index 31df20abe141f..ab7f5678ebc44 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> @@ -232,8 +232,9 @@ static unsigned long long iblock_emulate_read_cap_with_block_size(
>   	struct block_device *bd,
>   	struct request_queue *q)
>   {
> -	unsigned long long blocks_long = (div_u64(i_size_read(bd->bd_inode),
> -					bdev_logical_block_size(bd)) - 1);
> +	loff_t size = bdev_nr_sectors(bd) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> +	unsigned long long blocks_long =
> +		div_u64(size, bdev_logical_block_size(bd)) - 1;
>   	u32 block_size = bdev_logical_block_size(bd);

To enhance readability, would it make sense to shift the new lines
behind "u32 block_size = ...", so block_size can be used in div_u64
instead of using bdev_logical_block_size twice?

>   
>   	if (block_size == dev->dev_attrib.block_size)
>