linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 21/29] reiserfs: use bdev_nr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211013104343.GF19200@quack2.suse.cz>
Date:   Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:43:43 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
        Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
        Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>,
        Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>,
        Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Phillip Lougher <phillip@...ashfs.org.uk>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        dm-devel@...hat.com, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
        linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net, ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev,
        reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/29] reiserfs: use bdev_nr_sectors instead of open
 coding it

On Wed 13-10-21 07:10:34, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Use the proper helper to read the block device size and remove two
> cargo culted checks that can't be false.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

Looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/reiserfs/super.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/super.c b/fs/reiserfs/super.c
> index 58481f8d63d5b..6c9681e2809f0 100644
> --- a/fs/reiserfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/reiserfs/super.c
> @@ -1986,8 +1986,7 @@ static int reiserfs_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void *data, int silent)
>  	 * smaller than the filesystem. If the check fails then abort and
>  	 * scream, because bad stuff will happen otherwise.
>  	 */
> -	if (s->s_bdev && s->s_bdev->bd_inode
> -	    && i_size_read(s->s_bdev->bd_inode) <
> +	if ((bdev_nr_sectors(s->s_bdev) << SECTOR_SHIFT) <
>  	    sb_block_count(rs) * sb_blocksize(rs)) {
>  		SWARN(silent, s, "", "Filesystem cannot be "
>  		      "mounted because it is bigger than the device");
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR