linux-ext4 - Re: don't use ->bd_inode to access the block device size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211014062844.GA25448@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:28:44 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
        Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
        Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>,
        Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>,
        Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Phillip Lougher <phillip@...ashfs.org.uk>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        dm-devel@...hat.com, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
        linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net, ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev,
        reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: don't use ->bd_inode to access the block device size

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 07:10:13AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I wondered about adding a helper for looking at the size in byte units
> to avoid the SECTOR_SHIFT shifts in various places.  But given that
> I could not come up with a good name and block devices fundamentally
> work in sector size granularity I decided against that.

So it seems like the biggest review feedback is that we should have
such a helper.  I think the bdev_size name is the worst as size does
not imply a particular unit.  bdev_nr_bytes is a little better but I'm
not too happy.  Any other suggestions or strong opinions?