[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h-KxpwJtrM4VV64J7EPk9JCPeW27jtPXyArarfeo9noA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 11:20:53 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kuehling, Felix" <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm: remove extra ZONE_DEVICE struct page refcount
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 9:39 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 12:44:50PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Assuming changing FSDAX is hard.. How would DAX people feel about just
> > deleting the PUD/PMD support until it can be done with compound pages?
>
> I think there are customers who would find that an unacceptable answer :-)
No, not given the number of end users that ask for help debugging PMD support.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists