linux-ext4 - Re: don't use ->bd_inode to access the block device size v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <81f9ad59-4c15-b265-1274-62c987ad879b@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:04:57 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@...il.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
        Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
        Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>,
        Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>,
        Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Phillip Lougher <phillip@...ashfs.org.uk>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        dm-devel@...hat.com, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
        linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: don't use ->bd_inode to access the block device size v3

On 10/18/21 7:04 PM, Kari Argillander wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:53:08AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> snip..
> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/genhd.h b/include/linux/genhd.h
>> index 7b0326661a1e..a967b3fb3c71 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/genhd.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/genhd.h
>> @@ -236,14 +236,14 @@ static inline sector_t get_start_sect(struct block_device *bdev)
>>  	return bdev->bd_start_sect;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline loff_t bdev_nr_bytes(struct block_device *bdev)
>> +static inline sector_t bdev_nr_sectors(struct block_device *bdev)
>>  {
>> -	return i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode);
>> +	return bdev->bd_nr_sectors;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline sector_t bdev_nr_sectors(struct block_device *bdev)
>> +static inline loff_t bdev_nr_bytes(struct block_device *bdev)
>>  {
>> -	return bdev_nr_bytes(bdev) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
>> +	return bdev_nr_setors(bdev) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> 
> setors -> sectors

Yep, did catch that prior.

-- 
Jens Axboe