[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxhCsCPNN=Xb6Xo9VpW+rYCkMUy-1zEXO41d1D4vN74GcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:09:19 +0300
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 24/31] fanotify: Report fid entry even for zero-length file_handle
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:30 PM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
<krisman@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Non-inode errors will reported with an empty file_handle. In
> preparation for that, allow some events to print the FID record even if
> there isn't any file_handle encoded
>
> Even though FILEID_ROOT is used internally, make zero-length file
> handles be reported as FILEID_INVALID.
>
> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
>
> ---
> Changes since v8:
> - Move fanotify_event_has_object_fh check here (jan)
Logically, this move is wrong, because after this patch,
copy_fid_info_to_user() can theoretically be called with NULL fh in the
existing construct of:
if (fanotify_event_has_object_fh(event)) {
...
ret = copy_fid_info_to_user(fanotify_event_fsid(event),
fanotify_event_object_fh(event),
The thing that prevents this case in effect is that FAN_FS_ERROR
is not yet wired, but I am not sure if leaving this theoretic bisect
issue is a good idea.
Anyway, that's a very minor theoretic issue and I am sure Jan can
decide whether to deal with it and how (no need to post v10 IMO).
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists