linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v9 00/31] file system-wide error monitoring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:36:38 +0300
From:   Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:     Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/31] file system-wide error monitoring

On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 2:22 PM Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> On Tue 26-10-21 12:12:38, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:27 PM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
> > <krisman@...labora.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is the 9th version of this patch series.  Thank you, Amir, Jan and
> > > Ted, for the feedback in the previous versions.
> > >
> > > The main difference in this version is that the pool is no longer
> > > resizeable nor limited in number of marks, even though we only
> > > pre-allocate 32 slots.  In addition, ext4 was modified to always return
> > > non-zero errno, and the documentation was fixed accordingly (No longer
> > > suggests we return EXT4_ERR* values.
> > >
> > > I also droped the Reviewed-by tags from the ext4 patch, due to the
> > > changes above.
> > >
> > > Please let me know what you think.
> > >
> >
> > All good on my end.
> > I've made a couple of minor comments that
> > could be addressed on commit if no other issues are found.
>
> All good on my end as well. I've applied all the minor updates, tested the
> result and pushed it out to fsnotify branch of my tree. WRT to your new
> FS_ERROR LTP tests, I've noticed that the testcases 1 and 3 from test
> fanotify20 fail for me. After a bit of debugging this seems to be a bug in
> ext4 where it calls ext4_abort() with EXT4_ERR_ESHUTDOWN instead of plain
> ESHUTDOWN. Not sure if you have that fixed or how come the tests passed for
> you. After fixing that ext4 bug everything passes for me.
>

Gabriel mentioned that bug in the cover letter of the LTP series :-)
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20211026173302.84000-1-krisman@collabora.com/T/#u

Thanks,
Amir.