lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 09:21:15 +0300 From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@...gle.com>, LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>, kernel@...labora.com, Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 12:17 AM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Now that FAN_FS_ERROR is close to being merged, I'm sending a new > version of the LTP tests. This is the v3 of this patchset, and it > applies the feedback of the previous version, in particular, it solves > the issue Amir pointed out, that ltp won't gracefully handle a test with > tcnt==0. To solve that, I merged the patch that set up the environment > with a simple test, that only triggers a fs abort and watches the > event. > > I'm also renaming the testcase from fanotify20 to fanotify21, to leave > room for the pidfs test that is also in the baking by Matthew Bobrowski. Only Matthew posted two tests... anyway I don't think merge is going to be a big problem. I am hoping that PIDFD tests could be merged soonish and I recommended Matthew to base his tests over your first two macro prep patches. Thanks, Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists