linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 30 Oct 2021 09:21:15 +0300
From:   Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To:     Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@...gle.com>,
        LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>,
        Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event

On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 12:17 AM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
<krisman@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Now that FAN_FS_ERROR is close to being merged, I'm sending a new
> version of the LTP tests.  This is the v3 of this patchset, and it
> applies the feedback of the previous version, in particular, it solves
> the issue Amir pointed out, that ltp won't gracefully handle a test with
> tcnt==0.  To solve that, I merged the patch that set up the environment
> with a simple test, that only triggers a fs abort and watches the
> event.
>
> I'm also renaming the testcase from fanotify20 to fanotify21, to leave
> room for the pidfs test that is also in the baking by Matthew Bobrowski.

Only Matthew posted two tests... anyway I don't think merge is going to be
a big problem. I am hoping that PIDFD tests could be merged soonish and
I recommended Matthew to base his tests over your first two macro prep
patches.

Thanks,
Amir.