lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:10:59 +0100 From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz> To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> Cc: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@...gle.com>, Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, kernel@...labora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>, LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 12:10 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz> wrote: > > Hi Gabriel, all, > > > Hi, > > > Now that FAN_FS_ERROR is close to being merged, I'm sending a new > > > version of the LTP tests. This is the v3 of this patchset, and it > > > applies the feedback of the previous version, in particular, it solves > > > the issue Amir pointed out, that ltp won't gracefully handle a test with > > > tcnt==0. To solve that, I merged the patch that set up the environment > > > with a simple test, that only triggers a fs abort and watches the > > > event. > > > I'm also renaming the testcase from fanotify20 to fanotify21, to leave > > > room for the pidfs test that is also in the baking by Matthew Bobrowski. > > > One important detail is that, for the tests to succeed, there is a > > > dependency on an ext4 fix I sent a few days ago: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20211026173302.84000-1-krisman@collabora.com/T/#u > > It has been merged into Theodore Ts'o ext4 tree into dev branch as c1e2e0350ce3 > > ("ext4: Fix error code saved on super block during file system abort") > > We should probably add it as .tags (see fanotify06.c). > No point in doing that. > There will be no kernel release which meets the test requirements > and has this bug. Yes, that's correct for stable kernels, enterprise kernels can backport FAN_FS_ERROR feature, while miss this fix (it does not mention Fixes). Kind regards, Petr > Thanks, > Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists