[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jjvoT=aW+_Ks+8L60HG0ypesSi8A+a5F2JXu1dEWHVCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 13:16:58 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/29] fsdax: simplify the offset check in dax_iomap_zero
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:34 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> The file relative offset must have the same alignment as the storage
> offset, so use that and get rid of the call to iomap_sector.
Agree.
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists