lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jjvoT=aW+_Ks+8L60HG0ypesSi8A+a5F2JXu1dEWHVCw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 13:16:58 -0800 From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/29] fsdax: simplify the offset check in dax_iomap_zero On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:34 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote: > > The file relative offset must have the same alignment as the storage > offset, so use that and get rid of the call to iomap_sector. Agree. Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists