[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211123231342.GW266024@magnolia>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:13:42 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/29] fsdax: don't require CONFIG_BLOCK
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 09:33:09AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The file system DAX code now does not require the block code. So allow
> building a kernel with fuse DAX but not block layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
> index 6d608330a096e..7a2b11c0b8036 100644
> --- a/fs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ source "fs/nilfs2/Kconfig"
> source "fs/f2fs/Kconfig"
> source "fs/zonefs/Kconfig"
>
> +endif # BLOCK
> +
> config FS_DAX
> bool "File system based Direct Access (DAX) support"
> depends on MMU
> @@ -89,8 +91,6 @@ config FS_DAX_PMD
> config FS_DAX_LIMITED
> bool
>
> -endif # BLOCK
> -
> # Posix ACL utility routines
> #
> # Note: Posix ACLs can be implemented without these helpers. Never use
> --
> 2.30.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists