lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5817114-8122-cf0e-ca8e-b5d1c9f43bc2@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:11:32 +0100
From:   Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To:     Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Problem with data=ordered ext4 mount option in linux-next

On linux-next systemd-remount-fs complains about an invalid mount option
here, resulting in a r/o root fs. After playing with the mount options
it turned out that data=ordered causes the problem. linux-next from Dec
1st was ok, so it seems to be related to the new mount API patches.

At a first glance I saw no obvious problem, the following looks good.
Maybe you have an idea where to look ..

static const struct constant_table ext4_param_data[] = {
	{"journal",	EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_DATA},
	{"ordered",	EXT4_MOUNT_ORDERED_DATA},
	{"writeback",	EXT4_MOUNT_WRITEBACK_DATA},
	{}
};

	fsparam_enum	("data",		Opt_data, ext4_param_data),


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ