linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC 0/1] ext4/054: Should we remove auto and quick group?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YfBY2pMmEFPb+qCF@mit.edu>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:08:58 -0500
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     fstests <fstests@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        chenlong <chenlongcl.chen@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1] ext4/054: Should we remove auto and quick group?

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:32:01AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Hello Zhang/Ted,
> 
> Looks like the issue fixed by patches at [1], were observed with fault injection
> testing and with errors=continue mount option. But were not cc'd to stable.
> 
> Do you think those should be cc'd to stable tree?

I already requested that they be backported, and they are in 5.10.89+
and 5.15.12+.  Unfortunately the patches don't backport cleanly into
5.4, and while I did the manual backport for 5.10, I haven't gotten
around to backporting them into 5.4 or older kernels.

       	  	      	   	       - Ted