lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 20:46:53 +0530 From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com> To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>, Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com> Subject: [RFC 4/6] ext4: No need to test for block bitmap bits in ext4_mb_mark_bb() We don't need the return value of mb_test_and_clear_bits() in ext4_mb_mark_bb() So simply use mb_clear_bits() instead. Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com> --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 60d32d3d8dc4..2f931575e6c2 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -3943,7 +3943,7 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block, if (state) ext4_set_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen); else - mb_test_and_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen); + mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, clen); if (ext4_has_group_desc_csum(sb) && (gdp->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT))) { gdp->bg_flags &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT); -- 2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists