lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:57:15 +0100
From:   Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>
To:     Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>
Cc:     Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@...gle.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event

> Hi!
> > > In any case, Petr, I suggest adding a short timeout to the test
> > > instead of the default 5min.
> > > Test takes less than 1 second on my VM on v5.16, so...
> > We usually don't lower the default timeout, but here it's a good idea since here
> > it blocks. It's similar speed on my machine, but I'd be conservative and put
> > timeout 10 sec. Sending patch.

> Actually I hope to change the default timeout once I finish my runtime
> patchset to something more reasonable as majority of LTP tests finish
> under one second.

+1. We can then revert that temporary fix for fanotify22.

Kind regards,
Petr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ