linux-ext4 - Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yfqtsi5Y0u8Sv2P8@yuki>
Date:   Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:13:38 +0100
From:   Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>
To:     Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>
Cc:     Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@...gle.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event

Hi!
> > In any case, Petr, I suggest adding a short timeout to the test
> > instead of the default 5min.
> > Test takes less than 1 second on my VM on v5.16, so...
> We usually don't lower the default timeout, but here it's a good idea since here
> it blocks. It's similar speed on my machine, but I'd be conservative and put
> timeout 10 sec. Sending patch.

Actually I hope to change the default timeout once I finish my runtime
patchset to something more reasonable as majority of LTP tests finish
under one second.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@...e.cz