[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <928e45728f7fe285d32bb3c2d5469aeabd8859b8.1644062450.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2022 19:39:53 +0530
From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCHv1 4/9] ext4: Use in_range() for range checking in ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded
Instead of open coding it, use in_range() function instead.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
fs/ext4/fast_commit.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
index 7964ee34e322..3c5baca38767 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
@@ -1875,8 +1875,8 @@ bool ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t blk)
if (state->fc_regions[i].ino == 0 ||
state->fc_regions[i].len == 0)
continue;
- if (blk >= state->fc_regions[i].pblk &&
- blk < state->fc_regions[i].pblk + state->fc_regions[i].len)
+ if (in_range(blk, state->fc_regions[i].pblk,
+ state->fc_regions[i].len))
return true;
}
return false;
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists