[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220207164541.ewtyvkrcbgvmqkbi@quack3.lan>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 17:45:41 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 9/9] ext4: Add extra check in ext4_mb_mark_bb() to
prevent against possible corruption
On Sat 05-02-22 19:39:58, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> This patch adds an extra checks in ext4_mb_mark_bb() function
> to make sure we mark & report error if we were to mark/clear any
> of the critical FS metadata specific bitmaps (&bail out) to prevent
> from any accidental corruption.
>
> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 9f2b3a057918..75c20a10529a 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -3918,6 +3918,14 @@ void ext4_mb_mark_bb(struct super_block *sb, ext4_fsblk_t block,
> EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) - EXT4_C2B(sbi, blkoff));
> clen = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, thisgrp_len);
>
> + if (!ext4_sb_block_valid(sb, NULL, block, thisgrp_len)) {
> + ext4_error(sb, "Marking blocks in system zone - "
> + "Block = %llu, len = %u",
> + block, thisgrp_len);
> + bitmap_bh = NULL;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> bitmap_bh = ext4_read_block_bitmap(sb, group);
> if (IS_ERR(bitmap_bh)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(bitmap_bh);
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists