lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 06:47:54 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>, Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.com>, "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>, Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>, Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>, Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>, Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com, syzbot+0ed9f769264276638893@...kaller.appspotmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "iomap: fall back to buffered writes for invalidation failures" On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 03:59:48PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > Well, maybe you should actually debug and try to understand what is > > going on before blindly reverting random commits. > > That is not a reasonable suggestion. In that case we fudamentally disagree what "reasonable" means. Sending a revert for a 2 year old commit based on a BUG in consumer of that subsystem based on a really old kernel without any explanation of why that revert is even directly related to the problem and not just a casuality is what I would define as completely unreasable. Please send a proper bug report to the ext4 maintainer first, and we can work from there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists