lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 17:15:25 +0100 From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> To: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Felix.Kuehling@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org, rcampbell@...dia.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, hch@....de, jgg@...dia.com, jglisse@...hat.com, apopple@...dia.com, willy@...radead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] mm: add zone device coherent type memory support On 01.02.22 16:48, Alex Sierra wrote: > Device memory that is cache coherent from device and CPU point of view. > This is used on platforms that have an advanced system bus (like CAPI > or CXL). Any page of a process can be migrated to such memory. However, > no one should be allowed to pin such memory so that it can always be > evicted. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com> > Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com> > Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com> So, I'm currently messing with PageAnon() pages and CoW semantics ... all these PageAnon() ZONE_DEVICE variants don't necessarily make my life easier but I'm not sure yet if they make my life harder. I hope you can help me understand some of that stuff. 1) What are expected CoW semantics for DEVICE_COHERENT? I assume we'll share them just like other PageAnon() pages during fork() readable, and the first sharer writing to them receives an "ordinary" !ZONE_DEVICE copy. So this would be just like DEVICE_EXCLUSIVE CoW handling I assume, just that we don't have to go through the loop of restoring a device exclusive entry? 2) How are these pages freed to clear/invalidate PageAnon() ? I assume for PageAnon() ZONE_DEVICE pages we'll always for via free_devmap_managed_page(), correct? 3) FOLL_PIN While you write "no one should be allowed to pin such memory", patch #2 only blocks FOLL_LONGTERM. So I assume we allow ordinary FOLL_PIN and you might want to be a bit more precise? ... I'm pretty sure we cannot FOLL_PIN DEVICE_PRIVATE pages, but can we FILL_PIN DEVICE_EXCLUSIVE pages? I strongly assume so? Thanks for any information. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists