lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20220215192110.GA883653@embeddedor> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:21:10 -0600 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org, mpi3mr-linuxdrv.pdl@...adcom.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, sparmaintainer@...sys.com, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ica.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] treewide: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:17:40AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:47:43AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare > > having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. > > Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these > > cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should > > no longer be used[2]. > > > > This code was transformed with the help of Coccinelle: > > (next-20220214$ spatch --jobs $(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN) --sp-file script.cocci --include-headers --dir . > output.patch) > > > > @@ > > identifier S, member, array; > > type T1, T2; > > @@ > > > > struct S { > > ... > > T1 member; > > T2 array[ > > - 0 > > ]; > > }; > > These all look trivially correct to me. Only two didn't have the end of > the struct visible in the patch, and checking those showed them to be > trailing members as well, so: > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> I'll add this to my -next tree. Thanks! -- Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists