lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu,  3 Mar 2022 10:14:14 -0500
From:   "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Cc:     "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
        jack@...e.cz, yukuai3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ext4: fix underflow in ext4_max_bitmap_size()

On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 19:17:04 +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> when ext4 filesystem is created with 64k block size, ^extent and
> ^huge_file features. the upper_limit would underflow during the
> computations in ext4_max_bitmap_size(). The problem is the size of block
> index tree for such large block size is more than i_blocks can carry.
> So fix the computation to count with this possibility. After this fix,
> the 'res' cannot overflow loff_t on the extreme case of filesystem with
> huge_files and 64K block size, so this patch also revert commit
> 75ca6ad408f4 ("ext4: fix loff_t overflow in ext4_max_bitmap_size()").
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] ext4: fix underflow in ext4_max_bitmap_size()
      commit: 5c93e8ecd5bd3bfdee013b6da0850357eb6ca4d8

Best regards,
-- 
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists