linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 03/11] MM: improve cleanup when ->readpages doesn't process all pages.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 04 Mar 2022 13:23:14 +1100
From:   "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To:     "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:     "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>, "Wu Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        "Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, "Chao Yu" <chao@...nel.org>,
        "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        "Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@...il.com>,
        "Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        "Anna Schumaker" <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        "Ryusuke Konishi" <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        "Philipp Reisner" <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
        "Lars Ellenberg" <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
        "Paolo Valente" <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        "Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-mm" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
        "Linux NFS list" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        "Ext4" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] MM: improve cleanup when ->readpages doesn't
 process all pages.

On Wed, 02 Mar 2022, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 04:18, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> > If ->readpages doesn't process all the pages, then it is best to act as
> > though they weren't requested so that a subsequent readahead can try
> > again.
> > So:
> >   - remove any 'ahead' pages from the page cache so they can be loaded
> >     with ->readahead() rather then multiple ->read()s
> >   - update the file_ra_state to reflect the reads that were actually
> >     submitted.
> >
> > This allows ->readpages() to abort early due e.g.  to congestion, which
> > will then allow us to remove the inode_read_congested() test from
> > page_Cache_async_ra().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
> > ---
> >  mm/readahead.c |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/readahead.c b/mm/readahead.c
> > index 73b2bc5302e0..8a97bd408cf6 100644
> > --- a/mm/readahead.c
> > +++ b/mm/readahead.c
> > @@ -104,7 +104,13 @@
> >   * for necessary resources (e.g.  memory or indexing information) to
> >   * become available.  Pages in the final ``async_size`` may be
> >   * considered less urgent and failure to read them is more acceptable.
> > - * They will eventually be read individually using ->readpage().
> > + * In this case it is best to use delete_from_page_cache() to remove the
> > + * pages from the page cache as is automatically done for pages that
> > + * were not fetched with readahead_page().  This will allow a
> > + * subsequent synchronous read ahead request to try them again.  If they
> > + * are left in the page cache, then they will be read individually using
> > + * ->readpage().
> > + *
> >   */
> >
> >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > @@ -226,8 +232,17 @@ static void read_pages(struct readahead_control *rac, struct list_head *pages,
> >
> >         if (aops->readahead) {
> >                 aops->readahead(rac);
> > -               /* Clean up the remaining pages */
> > +               /*
> > +                * Clean up the remaining pages.  The sizes in ->ra
> > +                * maybe be used to size next read-ahead, so make sure
> > +                * they accurately reflect what happened.
> > +                */
> >                 while ((page = readahead_page(rac))) {
> > +                       rac->ra->size -= 1;
> > +                       if (rac->ra->async_size > 0) {
> > +                               rac->ra->async_size -= 1;
> > +                               delete_from_page_cache(page);
> > +                       }
> 
> Does the  above imply that filesystem should submit at least ra->size
> pages, regardless of congestion?

   ra->size - ra_async_size 
pages should be submitted reguardless of congestion.

NeilBrown