linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH -next] ext4: fix warning in ext4_handle_inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sfr2qdc8.fsf@collabora.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:57:43 -0400
From:   Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
To:     Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Cc:     <tytso@....edu>, <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <jack@...e.cz>, <lczerner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ext4: fix warning in ext4_handle_inode_extension

Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com> writes:

> We got issue as follows:
> EXT4-fs error (device loop0) in ext4_reserve_inode_write:5741: Out of memory
> EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_setattr:5462: inode #13: comm syz-executor.0: mark_inode_dirty error
> EXT4-fs error (device loop0) in ext4_setattr:5519: Out of memory
> EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_ind_map_blocks:595: inode #13: comm syz-executor.0: Can't allocate blocks for non-extent mapped inodes with bigalloc
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 4361 at fs/ext4/file.c:301 ext4_file_write_iter+0x11c9/0x1220
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 PID: 4361 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.10.0+ #1
> RIP: 0010:ext4_file_write_iter+0x11c9/0x1220
> RSP: 0018:ffff924d80b27c00 EFLAGS: 00010282
> RAX: ffffffff815a3379 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000003b000000
> RDX: ffff924d81601000 RSI: 00000000000009cc RDI: 00000000000009cd
> RBP: 000000000000000d R08: ffffffffbc5a2c6b R09: 0000902e0e52a96f
> R10: ffff902e2b7c1b40 R11: ffff902e2b7c1b40 R12: 000000000000000a
> R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff902e0e52aa10 R15: ffffffffffffff8b
> FS:  00007f81a7f65700(0000) GS:ffff902e3bc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: ffffffffff600400 CR3: 000000012db88001 CR4: 00000000003706e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:
>  do_iter_readv_writev+0x2e5/0x360
>  do_iter_write+0x112/0x4c0
>  do_pwritev+0x1e5/0x390
>  __x64_sys_pwritev2+0x7e/0xa0
>  do_syscall_64+0x37/0x50
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>
> Above issue may happen as follows:
> Assume
> inode.i_size=4096
> EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize=4096
>
> step 1: set inode->i_isize = 8192
> ext4_setattr
>   if (attr->ia_size != inode->i_size)
>     EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = attr->ia_size;
>     rc = ext4_mark_inode_dirty
>        ext4_reserve_inode_write
>           ext4_get_inode_loc
>             __ext4_get_inode_loc
>               sb_getblk --> return -ENOMEM
>    ...
>    if (!error)  ->will not update i_size
>      i_size_write(inode, attr->ia_size);
> Now:
> inode.i_size=4096
> EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize=8192
>
> step 2: Direct write 4096 bytes
> ext4_file_write_iter
>  ext4_dio_write_iter
>    iomap_dio_rw ->return error
>  if (extend)
>    ext4_handle_inode_extension
>      WARN_ON_ONCE(i_size_read(inode) < EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize);
> ->Then trigger warning.
>
> To solve above issue, if mark inode dirty failed in ext4_setattr just
> set 'EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize' with old value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/inode.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 90fd6f7b6209..8adf1f802f6c 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -5384,6 +5384,7 @@ int ext4_setattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct dentry *dentry,
>  	if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) {
>  		handle_t *handle;
>  		loff_t oldsize = inode->i_size;
> +		loff_t old_disksize;
>  		int shrink = (attr->ia_size < inode->i_size);
>  
>  		if (!(ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS))) {
> @@ -5455,6 +5456,7 @@ int ext4_setattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct dentry *dentry,
>  					inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits);
>  
>  			down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> +			old_disksize = EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize;
>  			EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = attr->ia_size;
>  			rc = ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
>  			if (!error)
> @@ -5466,6 +5468,8 @@ int ext4_setattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct dentry *dentry,
>  			 */
>  			if (!error)
>  				i_size_write(inode, attr->ia_size);
> +			else
> +				EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = old_disksize;

Shouldn't this always be done if ext4_mark_inode_dirty fails?

if (rc)
    EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = old_disksize;

Otherwise you hit the same issue if (!error && rc), no?

-- 
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi