[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220331161911.7d5dlqfwm2kngnjk@riteshh-domain>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 21:49:11 +0530
From: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To: fstests <fstests@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] generic: Add some tests around journal
replay/recoveryloop
On 22/03/31 10:59PM, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 06:24:19PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi,
>
> Your below patches looks like not pure text format, they might contain
> binary character or some special characers, looks like the "^M" [1].
Ohh, is it. Might be some settings needed to be tweaked for using
gmail for community patches.
>
> So please check how you generate/edit/send these patches, make sure
> they're pure text for Linux then send again.
Sure Zorro, I will check it again at my end. However, when I tried using
b4 am -o - cover.1648730443.git.ritesh.list@...il.com | git am
It worked fine for me and applied all 4 patches to my local tree.
I also didn't notice any of such characters in my other inbox
("riteshh@...ibm.com"), which was cc'd too. hmm, strange.
Sure, I will check it once again at my end and resend this.
-ritesh
>
> Thanks,
> Zorro
>
>
> [1]
> # cat -A /path/to/your_patch
> index 95752d3b..5e73cff9 100755^M$
> --- a/tests/generic/468^M$
> +++ b/tests/generic/468^M$
> @@ -34,6 +34,13 @@ _scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1^M$
> _require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV^M$
> _scratch_mount^M$
> ^M$
> +# blocksize and fact are used in the last case of the fsync/fdatasync test.^M$
> +# This is mainly trying to test recovery operation in case where the data^M$
> +# blocks written, exceeds the default flex group size (32768*4096*16) in ext4.^M$
> +blocks=32768^M$
> +blocksize=4096^M$
> +fact=18^M$
> +^M$
> ...
> ...
>
> >
> > The ext4 fast_commit kernel fix has landed into mainline tree [1].
> > In this v3, I have addressed review comments from Darrick.
> > Does this looks good to be picked up?
> >
> > I have tested ext4 1k, 4k (w & w/o fast_commit). Also tested other FS with
> > default configs (like xfs, btrfs, f2fs). No surprises were seen.
> >
> > [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bfdc502a4a4c058bf4cbb1df0c297761d528f54d
> >
> > -ritesh
> >
> > Changelogs:
> > ===========
> >
> > v2 => v3
> > =========
> > 1. Addressed review comments from Darrick.
> > 2. Rebased to latest master.
> >
> > v1 => v2
> > =========
> > Sending v2 with tests/ext4/ converted to tests/generic/
> > (although I had not received any review comments on v1).
> > It seems all of the tests which I had sent in v1 are not ext4 specific anyways.
> > So in v2, I have made those into tests/generic/.
> >
> > Summary
> > =========
> > These are some of the tests which when tested with ext4 fast_commit feature
> > w/o kernel fixes, could cause tests failures and/or KASAN bug (generic/486).
> >
> > I gave these tests a run with default xfs, btrfs and f2fs configs (along with
> > ext4). No surprises observed.
> >
> > [v2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1647342932.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com/
> > [v1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1644070604.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com/
> >
> >
> > Ritesh Harjani (4):
> > generic/468: Add another falloc test entry
> > common/punch: Add block_size argument to _filter_fiemap_**
> > generic/678: Add a new shutdown recovery test
> > generic/679: Add a test to check unwritten extents tracking
> >
> > common/punch | 9 +++---
> > tests/generic/468 | 8 +++++
> > tests/generic/468.out | 2 ++
> > tests/generic/678 | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/generic/678.out | 7 +++++
> > tests/generic/679 | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/generic/679.out | 6 ++++
> > 7 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100755 tests/generic/678
> > create mode 100644 tests/generic/678.out
> > create mode 100755 tests/generic/679
> > create mode 100644 tests/generic/679.out
> >
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists