linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] generic: Add some tests around journal replay/recoveryloop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 2 Apr 2022 11:40:37 +0800
From:   Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
        fstests <fstests@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] generic: Add some tests around journal
 replay/recoveryloop

On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:04:51AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 01:30:47PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:23:35PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> > > On 22/03/31 09:49PM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> > > > On 22/03/31 10:59PM, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 06:24:19PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Your below patches looks like not pure text format, they might contain
> > > > > binary character or some special characers, looks like the "^M" [1].
> > > 
> > > Sorry to bother you. But here is what I tried.
> > > 1. Download the mbx file using b4 am. I didn't see any such character ("^M") in
> > >    the patches.
> > > 2. Saved the patch using mutt. Again didn't see such character while doing
> > > 	cat -A /patch/to/patch
> > > 3. Downloaded the mail using eml format from webmail. Here I do see this
> > >    character appended. But that happens not just for my patch, but for all
> > >    other patches too.
> > > 
> > > So could this be related to the way you are downloading these patches.
> > > Please let me know, if I need to resend these patches again? Because, I don't
> > > see this behavior at my end. But I would happy to correct it, if that's not the
> > > case.
> > 
> > Hmm... weird, When I tried to open your patch emails, my mutt show me:
> > 
> >   [-- application/octet-stream is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
> > 
> > Then I have to input 'v' to see the patch content. I'm not sure what's wrong,
> > this's the 2nd time I hit this "octet-stream is unsupported" issue yesterday.
> > 
> > Hi Darrick, or any other forks, can you open above 4 patches normally? If that's
> > only my personal issue, I'll check my side.
> 
> There's no application/octet anywhere in the email that I received.
> Has your IT department gone rogue^W^Wincreased value-add again?

Thanks Darrick and Ojaswin! I'll check with our IT department. But it's weird, only
this patchset and 2 of another patch[1](it's sent 3 times) has this problem, I see
all other patches normally. And Ritesh, sorry for taking your time to check it :-D

Thanks,
Zorro

[1]
[PATCH v2] generic/674: replace _require_scratch_reflink with _require_scratch_dedupe

> 
> --D
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Zorro
> > 
> > > 
> > > -ritesh
> > > 
> > 
>