lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 14:38:58 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> To: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@....com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>, david@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, rcampbell@...dia.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, jglisse@...hat.com, apopple@...dia.com, willy@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: add vm_normal_lru_pages for LRU handled pages only On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 04:08:35PM -0400, Felix Kuehling wrote: > > In general I find the vm_normal_lru_page vs vm_normal_page > > API highly confusing. An explicit check for zone device pages > > in the dozen or so spots that care has a much better documentation > > value, especially if accompanied by comments where it isn't entirely > > obvious. > > OK. We can do that. It would solve the function naming problem, and we'd > have more visibility of device page handling in more places in the kernel, > which has educational value. Personally I find the 'is page XYZ' pretty confusing, like I don't know half of what the PageKsm annotations are for.. Testing against a specific property the code goes on to use right away seems more descriptive to me. Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists