lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed,  6 Apr 2022 08:04:56 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
        nbd@...er.debian.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        cluster-devel@...hat.com, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev,
        ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active_zones instead of open coding it

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
index b7b5fac1c7790..5b85004d85d6c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
@@ -350,7 +350,6 @@ int btrfs_get_dev_zone_info(struct btrfs_device *device, bool populate_cache)
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = device->fs_info;
 	struct btrfs_zoned_device_info *zone_info = NULL;
 	struct block_device *bdev = device->bdev;
-	struct request_queue *queue = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
 	unsigned int max_active_zones;
 	unsigned int nactive;
 	sector_t nr_sectors;
@@ -410,7 +409,7 @@ int btrfs_get_dev_zone_info(struct btrfs_device *device, bool populate_cache)
 	if (!IS_ALIGNED(nr_sectors, zone_sectors))
 		zone_info->nr_zones++;
 
-	max_active_zones = queue_max_active_zones(queue);
+	max_active_zones = bdev_max_active_zones(bdev);
 	if (max_active_zones && max_active_zones < BTRFS_MIN_ACTIVE_ZONES) {
 		btrfs_err_in_rcu(fs_info,
 "zoned: %s: max active zones %u is too small, need at least %u active zones",
-- 
2.30.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists