[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220406070446.GA1722@ts.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 09:04:46 +0200
From: Alan.Robinson@...itsu.com (Alan Robinson)
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
"target-devel@...r.kernel.org" <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com" <drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"cluster-devel@...hat.com" <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-um@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
"nbd@...er.debian.org" <nbd@...er.debian.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org>,
"ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-raid@...r.kernel.org" <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev" <ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/27] block: use bdev_alignment_offset in
part_alignment_offset_show
Hi Christoph,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 06:05:04AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Subject: [PATCH 15/27] block: use bdev_alignment_offset in
> part_alignment_offset_show
>
> Replace the open coded offset calculation with the proper helper.
> This is an ABI change in that the -1 for a misaligned partition is
> properly propagated, which can be considered a bug fix and maches
s/maches/matches/
> what is done on the whole device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> block/partitions/core.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/partitions/core.c b/block/partitions/core.c
> index 2ef8dfa1e5c85..240b3fff521e4 100644
> --- a/block/partitions/core.c
> +++ b/block/partitions/core.c
> @@ -200,11 +200,7 @@ static ssize_t part_ro_show(struct device *dev,
> static ssize_t part_alignment_offset_show(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> - struct block_device *bdev = dev_to_bdev(dev);
> -
> - return sprintf(buf, "%u\n",
> - queue_limit_alignment_offset(&bdev_get_queue(bdev)->limits,
> - bdev->bd_start_sect));
> + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", bdev_alignment_offset(dev_to_bdev(dev)));
Should this now be %d instead of %u, there are one or two examples of
both in the rest of the patch series.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists