linux-ext4 - [PATCH 21/27] block: move {bdev,queue_limit}_discard

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220406060516.409838-22-hch@lst.de>
Date:   Wed,  6 Apr 2022 08:05:10 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
        nbd@...er.debian.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        cluster-devel@...hat.com, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev,
        ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH 21/27] block: move {bdev,queue_limit}_discard_alignment out of line

No need to inline these fairly larger helpers.  Also fix the return value
to be unsigned, just like the field in struct queue_limits.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 block/blk-settings.c   | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/blkdev.h | 34 +---------------------------------
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index 94410a13c0dee..fd83d674afd0a 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -478,6 +478,30 @@ static int queue_limit_alignment_offset(struct queue_limits *lim,
 	return (granularity + lim->alignment_offset - alignment) % granularity;
 }
 
+static unsigned int queue_limit_discard_alignment(struct queue_limits *lim,
+		sector_t sector)
+{
+	unsigned int alignment, granularity, offset;
+
+	if (!lim->max_discard_sectors)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Why are these in bytes, not sectors? */
+	alignment = lim->discard_alignment >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
+	granularity = lim->discard_granularity >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
+	if (!granularity)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Offset of the partition start in 'granularity' sectors */
+	offset = sector_div(sector, granularity);
+
+	/* And why do we do this modulus *again* in blkdev_issue_discard()? */
+	offset = (granularity + alignment - offset) % granularity;
+
+	/* Turn it back into bytes, gaah */
+	return offset << SECTOR_SHIFT;
+}
+
 static unsigned int blk_round_down_sectors(unsigned int sectors, unsigned int lbs)
 {
 	sectors = round_down(sectors, lbs >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
@@ -924,3 +948,14 @@ int bdev_alignment_offset(struct block_device *bdev)
 	return q->limits.alignment_offset;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bdev_alignment_offset);
+
+unsigned int bdev_discard_alignment(struct block_device *bdev)
+{
+	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
+
+	if (bdev_is_partition(bdev))
+		return queue_limit_discard_alignment(&q->limits,
+				bdev->bd_start_sect);
+	return q->limits.discard_alignment;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bdev_discard_alignment);
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 5a9b7aeda010b..34b1cfd067421 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -1252,39 +1252,7 @@ bdev_zone_write_granularity(struct block_device *bdev)
 }
 
 int bdev_alignment_offset(struct block_device *bdev);
-
-static inline int queue_limit_discard_alignment(struct queue_limits *lim, sector_t sector)
-{
-	unsigned int alignment, granularity, offset;
-
-	if (!lim->max_discard_sectors)
-		return 0;
-
-	/* Why are these in bytes, not sectors? */
-	alignment = lim->discard_alignment >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
-	granularity = lim->discard_granularity >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
-	if (!granularity)
-		return 0;
-
-	/* Offset of the partition start in 'granularity' sectors */
-	offset = sector_div(sector, granularity);
-
-	/* And why do we do this modulus *again* in blkdev_issue_discard()? */
-	offset = (granularity + alignment - offset) % granularity;
-
-	/* Turn it back into bytes, gaah */
-	return offset << SECTOR_SHIFT;
-}
-
-static inline int bdev_discard_alignment(struct block_device *bdev)
-{
-	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
-
-	if (bdev_is_partition(bdev))
-		return queue_limit_discard_alignment(&q->limits,
-				bdev->bd_start_sect);
-	return q->limits.discard_alignment;
-}
+unsigned int bdev_discard_alignment(struct block_device *bdev);
 
 static inline unsigned int bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(struct block_device *bdev)
 {
-- 
2.30.2