linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 07/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220407152659.GA15200@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 7 Apr 2022 17:26:59 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     dsterba@...e.cz, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, nbd@...er.debian.org,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        cluster-devel@...hat.com, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev,
        ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active_zones instead of open
 coding it

On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 05:20:49PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:04:56AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> 
> As it's a standalone patch I can take it (possibly with other similar
> prep btrfs patches) in current development cycle to relieve the
> inter-tree dependencies.

Unless there's a conflict in other btrfs patches it would probably be
easiest to merge everything through the block tree.