[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <530b0d48-96fc-e157-38f5-a87d85c7d2c6@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:02:18 +0800
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
nbd@...er.debian.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
cluster-devel@...hat.com, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active_zones instead of open
coding it
On 4/15/22 12:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
> Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> index 1b1b310c3c510..f72cad7391a11 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> @@ -350,7 +350,6 @@ int btrfs_get_dev_zone_info(struct btrfs_device *device, bool populate_cache)
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = device->fs_info;
> struct btrfs_zoned_device_info *zone_info = NULL;
> struct block_device *bdev = device->bdev;
> - struct request_queue *queue = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> unsigned int max_active_zones;
> unsigned int nactive;
> sector_t nr_sectors;
> @@ -410,7 +409,7 @@ int btrfs_get_dev_zone_info(struct btrfs_device *device, bool populate_cache)
> if (!IS_ALIGNED(nr_sectors, zone_sectors))
> zone_info->nr_zones++;
>
> - max_active_zones = queue_max_active_zones(queue);
> + max_active_zones = bdev_max_active_zones(bdev);
> if (max_active_zones && max_active_zones < BTRFS_MIN_ACTIVE_ZONES) {
> btrfs_err_in_rcu(fs_info,
> "zoned: %s: max active zones %u is too small, need at least %u active zones",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists