lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:02:18 +0800 From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> Cc: dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, nbd@...er.debian.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@...hat.com, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active_zones instead of open coding it On 4/15/22 12:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> > Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com> > Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com> LGTM. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c > index 1b1b310c3c510..f72cad7391a11 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c > @@ -350,7 +350,6 @@ int btrfs_get_dev_zone_info(struct btrfs_device *device, bool populate_cache) > struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = device->fs_info; > struct btrfs_zoned_device_info *zone_info = NULL; > struct block_device *bdev = device->bdev; > - struct request_queue *queue = bdev_get_queue(bdev); > unsigned int max_active_zones; > unsigned int nactive; > sector_t nr_sectors; > @@ -410,7 +409,7 @@ int btrfs_get_dev_zone_info(struct btrfs_device *device, bool populate_cache) > if (!IS_ALIGNED(nr_sectors, zone_sectors)) > zone_info->nr_zones++; > > - max_active_zones = queue_max_active_zones(queue); > + max_active_zones = bdev_max_active_zones(bdev); > if (max_active_zones && max_active_zones < BTRFS_MIN_ACTIVE_ZONES) { > btrfs_err_in_rcu(fs_info, > "zoned: %s: max active zones %u is too small, need at least %u active zones",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists