linux-ext4 - [PATCH v2 1/7] ext4: Match the f2fs ci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220428221027.269084-2-krisman@collabora.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:10:21 -0400
From:   Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
To:     tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jaegeuk@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        ebiggers@...nel.org,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        kernel@...labora.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] ext4: Match the f2fs ci_compare implementation

ext4_ci_compare originally follows utf8_*_strcmp, which means return
zero on match.  This means that every usage of that in ext4 negates
the return.

Turn it into a predicate function, let it follow the kernel convention
and return true on match, which means it's now the same as its f2fs
counterpart and can be extracted into generic code.

This change also makes it more obvious that we are ignoring error
handling in ext4_match, which can occur since casefolding support (bad
utf8 name due to disk corruption on strict mode causes -EINVAL) and
casefold+encryption (-ENOMEM).  For now, keep the behavior.  It is
handled by the following patches.

While we are there, change the comment to the kernel-doc style.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
---
changes since v1:
  - rename to match f2fs naming (Eric)
---
 fs/ext4/namei.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
index 767b4bfe39c3..c363f637057d 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -1318,22 +1318,29 @@ static void dx_insert_block(struct dx_frame *frame, u32 hash, ext4_lblk_t block)
 }
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE)
-/*
+/**
+ * ext4_match_ci() - Match (case-insensitive) a name with a dirent.
+ * @parent: Inode of the parent of the dentry.
+ * @name: name under lookup.
+ * @de_name: Dirent name.
+ * @de_name_len: dirent name length.
+ * @quick: whether @name is already casefolded.
+ *
  * Test whether a case-insensitive directory entry matches the filename
- * being searched for.  If quick is set, assume the name being looked up
- * is already in the casefolded form.
+ * being searched.  If quick is set, the @name being looked up is
+ * already in the casefolded form.
  *
- * Returns: 0 if the directory entry matches, more than 0 if it
- * doesn't match or less than zero on error.
+ * Return: > 0 if the directory entry matches, 0 if it doesn't match, or
+ * < 0 on error.
  */
-static int ext4_ci_compare(const struct inode *parent, const struct qstr *name,
-			   u8 *de_name, size_t de_name_len, bool quick)
+static int ext4_match_ci(const struct inode *parent, const struct qstr *name,
+			 u8 *de_name, size_t de_name_len, bool quick)
 {
 	const struct super_block *sb = parent->i_sb;
 	const struct unicode_map *um = sb->s_encoding;
 	struct fscrypt_str decrypted_name = FSTR_INIT(NULL, de_name_len);
 	struct qstr entry = QSTR_INIT(de_name, de_name_len);
-	int ret;
+	int ret, match = false;
 
 	if (IS_ENCRYPTED(parent)) {
 		const struct fscrypt_str encrypted_name =
@@ -1354,20 +1361,22 @@ static int ext4_ci_compare(const struct inode *parent, const struct qstr *name,
 		ret = utf8_strncasecmp_folded(um, name, &entry);
 	else
 		ret = utf8_strncasecmp(um, name, &entry);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		/* Handle invalid character sequence as either an error
-		 * or as an opaque byte sequence.
+
+	if (!ret)
+		match = true;
+	else if (ret < 0 && !sb_has_strict_encoding(sb)) {
+		/*
+		 * In non-strict mode, fallback to a byte comparison if
+		 * the names have invalid characters.
 		 */
-		if (sb_has_strict_encoding(sb))
-			ret = -EINVAL;
-		else if (name->len != entry.len)
-			ret = 1;
-		else
-			ret = !!memcmp(name->name, entry.name, entry.len);
+		ret = 0;
+		match = ((name->len == entry.len) &&
+			 !memcmp(name->name, entry.name, entry.len));
 	}
+
 out:
 	kfree(decrypted_name.name);
-	return ret;
+	return (ret >= 0) ? match : ret;
 }
 
 int ext4_fname_setup_ci_filename(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *iname,
@@ -1418,6 +1427,7 @@ static bool ext4_match(struct inode *parent,
 			      struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de)
 {
 	struct fscrypt_name f;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!de->inode)
 		return false;
@@ -1442,11 +1452,22 @@ static bool ext4_match(struct inode *parent,
 					return false;
 				}
 			}
-			return !ext4_ci_compare(parent, &cf, de->name,
-							de->name_len, true);
+			ret = ext4_match_ci(parent, &cf, de->name,
+					    de->name_len, true);
+		} else {
+			ret = ext4_match_ci(parent, fname->usr_fname,
+					    de->name, de->name_len, false);
+		}
+
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			/*
+			 * Treat comparison errors as not a match.  The
+			 * only case where it happens is on a disk
+			 * corruption or ENOMEM.
+			 */
+			return false;
 		}
-		return !ext4_ci_compare(parent, fname->usr_fname, de->name,
-						de->name_len, false);
+		return ret;
 	}
 #endif
 
-- 
2.35.1